Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

El laberinto de los espejos de la igualdad, diversidad e inclusión en la inteligencia artificial (The hall of mirrors of equality, diversity and inclusion in artificial intelligence)

Authors: Navarro-López, Eva María;

El laberinto de los espejos de la igualdad, diversidad e inclusión en la inteligencia artificial (The hall of mirrors of equality, diversity and inclusion in artificial intelligence)

Abstract

Equality, diversity, inclusion (EDI), and ethics are buzzwords, like AI itself. Whilst ‘EDI in AI’ and ‘Ethics in AI’ events multiply, less people from disadvantaged communities and vulnerable contexts opt to study AI-related degrees. ‘Women in AI’ events proliferate, as more women express a desire to leave their jobs in academia, science and technology. Numbers are clear: less than 20% of technical workers in companies are women and only 22% of professionals working in AI around the world are female. The numbers are dramatic if we add other attributes, like race and disadvantaged backgrounds. For example, less than 2% of the workforce in technology are women of colour. AI is typically run by privileged communities, especially in academia where there is bias against disadvantaged backgrounds. More underrepresented communities are needed in AI. Everybody must be included. If the goal is to shape the future of AI and technological progress, a humane new perspective is needed to find solutions to these problems. The solutions cannot be superficial, which has been the case so far, otherwise the long-standing iniquities of tokenism, vicious circles of privilege and hostile working environments will be perpetuated. Currently, biases are masked within biases in algorithms. Algorithms and data are just a reflection of what we are as humans and what the sector is. This talk shows why we need to challenge the current voices on equality, diversity, inclusion and ethics, and provoke a profound debate on the current status quo. A transformative viewpoint is presented with some ideas for positive change and democratisation of AI-related areas.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Ethics in artificial intelligence, Artificial intelligence, Sexual and Gender Minorities, Communities in artificial intelligence, Feminist AI, Artificial Intelligence/ethics, Gender bias, Data feminism, Fairness in science and technology, Science, technology, engineering and mathematics, Equity, diversity and inclusion

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Funded by
Related to Research communities