Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Costs and profit analysis for owning and operating of some farm machinery in the Gezira scheme, Sudan

Authors: Lotfie A. Yousif1, Mohamed D. Yousif2 and Shaker Babiker Ahmed3*;

Costs and profit analysis for owning and operating of some farm machinery in the Gezira scheme, Sudan

Abstract

Abstract Farm machinery cost is important issue for machinery management. Farmers in the Gezira scheme, Sudan owned several machinery types. Unfortunately, information about their costs and profitability is inadequate. This study aimed at analyzing costs and determining profit for machinery owned by farmers in the scheme. The required data was collected through questionnaire from machinery owners, it included tractor make and implements type, purchase price, annual covered area and work rate. In addition to variable cost items, customer rental rate and driver wage. Ten implements were studied namely; disk plow, chisel plow, moldboard plow, disk harrow, scraper, ridger, ditcher, row planter, seed drill and sprayer. Costs and profit were calculated by using standard procedures. The results showed variations in fixed cost amongst implement. Moldboard plow and scraper obtained the highest and the lowest fixed costs, respectively. The percentage of fixed cost for implement and tractor was between 11% and 28% from total operation cost. Fuel and driver costs were the highest amongst variable cost items, they represented more than 50% of total variable cost. Disk plow and sprayer obtained the highest and lowest total operation cost, respectively. All of the studied implements were profitable and their benefit cost ratio was between 1.5 to 2.7. Row planter and moldboard obtained the highest and the lowest annual net return, respectively. The profitability of machinery in the Gezira scheme may encourage farmers to invest in other machinery types. Keywords: Mechanized farm operations, fixed cost, variable cost, benefit cost ratio, private farmers.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green