Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Advanced Gall Bladder Carcinoma

Authors: Sweta Kumari; Anita Kumari;

Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Advanced Gall Bladder Carcinoma

Abstract

Background: Gall Bladder Carcinoma (GBC), an uncommon and aggressive malignancy, is typically detected at a late stage and has a poor prognosis. The usual treatment is gemcitabine and cisplatin, but novel combina-tions like GEMoX, which combines gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, are being tested. This experiment examined GEMOX’s safety and efficacy in advanced GBC. Methods: A retrospective study examined 200 NMCH Patna patients who received GEMOX for advanced GBC between April 2022 and April 2024. The GEMOX regimen consisted of six cycles per 21 days, each involving 1000 mg/m² gemcitabine on Days 1 and 8 and 85 mg/m² oxaliplatin on Day 1. Adverse effects, response rates, PFS, and OS were assessed. Data from medical records was evaluated using SPSS or R. Results: Progress-free survival was 4.5 months (95% CI: 4.0-5.0) and overall survival was 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.9-9.5). Only 5% of patients fully recovered, 35% improved, 40% did not change, and 20% worsened. Stabilisation was 80% and disease control 40%. Most adverse effects were mild to moderate, including 30% neutropenia, 40% nausea/vomiting, and 25% peripheral neuropathy. Patients changed dosage 20% of the time and stopped taking medicine 10% of the time. Conclusion: With acceptable toxicity, GEMOX improves survival in advanced GBC patients. This treatment works well when surgical excision is not possible.

Background: Gall Bladder Carcinoma (GBC), an uncommon and aggressive malignancy, is typically detected at a late stage and has a poor prognosis. The usual treatment is gemcitabine and cisplatin, but novel combina-tions like GEMoX, which combines gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, are being tested. This experiment examined GEMOX’s safety and efficacy in advanced GBC. Methods: A retrospective study examined 200 NMCH Patna patients who received GEMOX for advanced GBC between April 2022 and April 2024. The GEMOX regimen consisted of six cycles per 21 days, each involving 1000 mg/m² gemcitabine on Days 1 and 8 and 85 mg/m² oxaliplatin on Day 1. Adverse effects, response rates, PFS, and OS were assessed. Data from medical records was evaluated using SPSS or R. Results: Progress-free survival was 4.5 months (95% CI: 4.0-5.0) and overall survival was 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.9-9.5). Only 5% of patients fully recovered, 35% improved, 40% did not change, and 20% worsened. Stabilisation was 80% and disease control 40%. Most adverse effects were mild to moderate, including 30% neutropenia, 40% nausea/vomiting, and 25% peripheral neuropathy. Patients changed dosage 20% of the time and stopped taking medicine 10% of the time. Conclusion: With acceptable toxicity, GEMOX improves survival in advanced GBC patients. This treatment works well when surgical excision is not possible.

Keywords

Adverse Effects, Gall Bladder Carcinoma, Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, Treatment Regimen

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green