Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Role of Ultrasonography Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) of Hepatic Lesions and Its Histopathological Correlation

Authors: Afreen Asgar; Chand Prakash Jaiswal; Reena Sinha; Amod Kumar; Sunil Kumar;

Role of Ultrasonography Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) of Hepatic Lesions and Its Histopathological Correlation

Abstract

Background: The liver is the largest internal organ of the body. The present study was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of guided FNAC in neoplastic and non-neoplastic focal lesions of the liver. Materials & Methods: Seventy-two patients admitted to or attending the OPD of Nalanda Medical College and Hospital with suspected hepatic lesions. The present study included a total of 72 fine needle aspirates obtained from patients who visited our pathology department with various space-occupying lesions of the liver. Ultrasonography was done. For histopathological examination, the core needle biopsy was performed concurrently with the FNA under local anaesthesia and ultrasound guidance using the Vim-Silverman liver biopsy needle, wherever possible. The tissue obtained was fixed in 10% formalin and processed. The paraffin sections were stained with routine H & E stains. All the results were recorded in a Microsoft Excel sheet and were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software. Results: Cytological diagnosis was neoplastic lesions in 69.56 percent of the patients, while it was non-neoplastic lesions in the remaining 30.43 percent of the patients. Statistical Indices of FNA Diagnosis as calculated by the Galen and Gambino method: Sensitivity: 94.12% Specificity: 80% Positive Predictive Value (PPV): 96.97% Negative Predictive Value (NPV): 66.67% Diagnostic Accuracy: 92.31% Area Under Curve (AUC): 0.871 P value: 0.001 (Significant). Conclusion: Guided FNAC is a safe, useful, and economic procedure with virtually no complications and can be routinely done for assisting the diagnosis of liver diseases in our clinical setup. USG/CT guidance offers a better approach to hepatic lesions and avoids injury to vital abdominal structures.

Background: The liver is the largest internal organ of the body. The present study was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of guided FNAC in neoplastic and non-neoplastic focal lesions of the liver. Materials & Methods: Seventy-two patients admitted to or attending the OPD of Nalanda Medical College and Hospital with suspected hepatic lesions. The present study included a total of 72 fine needle aspirates obtained from patients who visited our pathology department with various space-occupying lesions of the liver. Ultrasonography was done. For histopathological examination, the core needle biopsy was performed concurrently with the FNA under local anaesthesia and ultrasound guidance using the Vim-Silverman liver biopsy needle, wherever possible. The tissue obtained was fixed in 10% formalin and processed. The paraffin sections were stained with routine H & E stains. All the results were recorded in a Microsoft Excel sheet and were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software. Results: Cytological diagnosis was neoplastic lesions in 69.56 percent of the patients, while it was non-neoplastic lesions in the remaining 30.43 percent of the patients. Statistical Indices of FNA Diagnosis as calculated by the Galen and Gambino method: Sensitivity: 94.12% Specificity: 80% Positive Predictive Value (PPV): 96.97% Negative Predictive Value (NPV): 66.67% Diagnostic Accuracy: 92.31% Area Under Curve (AUC): 0.871 P value: 0.001 (Significant). Conclusion: Guided FNAC is a safe, useful, and economic procedure with virtually no complications and can be routinely done for assisting the diagnosis of liver diseases in our clinical setup. USG/CT guidance offers a better approach to hepatic lesions and avoids injury to vital abdominal structures.

Related Organizations
Keywords

FNAC, neoplastic, non-neoplastic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green