
The full text for this paper is available at: Depositing biological segmentation datasets FAIRly Elaine ML Ho, Dimitrios Ladakis, Mark Basham, Michele C Darrow bioRxiv 2024.12.10.627814; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.10.627814 This repository contains the data and Jupyter notebooks to reproduce the figures from the paper. Abstract Segmentation of biological images identifies regions of an image which correspond to specific features of interest, which can be analysed quantitatively to answer biological questions. This task has long been a barrier to conducting large-scale biological imaging studies as it is time- and labour-intensive. Modern artificial intelligence segmentation tools can automate this process, but require high quality segmentation data for training, which is challenging to acquire. Biological segmentation data has been produced for many years, but this data is not often reused to develop new tools as it is hard to find, access, and use. Recent disparate efforts (Iudin, et al., 2023; Xu, et al., 2021; Vogelstein, et al., 2018; Ermel, et al., 2024) have been made to facilitate deposition and re-use of these valuable datasets, but more work is needed to increase re-usability. In this work, we review the current state of publicly available annotation and segmentation datasets and make specific recommendations to increase re-usability following FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, re-usable) principles (Wilkinson, et al., 2016) for the future.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
