
Theophylline monohydrate and polymorphs of anhydrous theophylline are being compared. Crystallographic data was obtained using the Cambridge structural data source. In this investigation, 1,3-Dimethyl-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione monohydrate (Ref-code: THEOPH) and 1,3-Dimethyl-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione (Ref-code: BAPLOT) are chosen. Hirshfeld surface tools were used to visualize the different types of intermolecular interactions throughout the crystal range of theophylline monohydrate and polymorphs of anhydrous theophylline. The fundamental distinction between theophylline monohydrate and anhydrous theophylline appears to be the N—H...O bond dimer. Some other weak interactions distinguish the molecular packing. After the creation of two N—H...O hydrogen bonds, the theophylline dimers that make up the theophylline monohydrate structure are joined by an inversion center. Because of these dimers and having a lagre percenrage of hydrogen and oxygen interactions theophylline monohydrate has a distinctive structure and better tabletability than anhydrous theophylline.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
