
This study investigates the efficiency and effectiveness of green solvents in chemical reactions, comparing their performance to traditional solvents in terms of reaction yield, time, selectivity and environmental impact. Green solvents such as water, ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents (DES), and supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO₂) offer sustainable alternatives to traditional solvents, which often pose significant environmental and health risks. Experimental results reveal that green solvents consistently achieve higher yields (5%-18% improvement), reduced reaction times (25%-40% faster), and superior selectivity (up to 12% higher) across various reactions, including esterification, oxidation, polymerization and transesterification. Additionally, green solvents significantly reduce toxicity, emissions and energy consumption, aligning with green chemistry principles. However, challenges such as high production costs and scalability remain barriers to widespread adoption. This research highlights the potential of green solvents to transform chemical processes into more sustainable practices, offering insights for their integration into industrial applications while promoting environmental conservation.
Traditional, solvents, consumption, emission, environmental conservation
Traditional, solvents, consumption, emission, environmental conservation
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
