Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparative Effect of Smoking and Vaping on Intraoral Health: Analyzing Threat, Outcomes and Behavioral Influences

Authors: Siddiqua, Fahmida; Akhanda, Manna Haque; Mahmud, Shamsuddin; Islam, Md. Atikul; Bhowmick, Sumana; Sonia, Zinat Ara;

Comparative Effect of Smoking and Vaping on Intraoral Health: Analyzing Threat, Outcomes and Behavioral Influences

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Smoking related with multiple unfavorable effect on oral tissue and ample sequelae of complexity. E-cigarette initially gained its acceptance as cessation device though American Dental Association (ADA) not advocated it as a tobacco substitute. This study enquires into the exert influence of smoking and vaping on dental health, emphasizing risks, significance, and the behavioral factors driving this practice. A few research directly compares the dental health significances of smoking and vaping, hindering efforts to inform public health policies and interventions tailored to both behaviors. Method: A mixed-methods study was conducted, recruiting daily and occasional smokers and vapers, as well as non-users as a control group. Quantitative data involved surveys on smoking/vaping habits, oral health status, and biopsychosocial factors, alongside dental assessments. Qualitative data were gathered via semi-structured interviews exploring participants' perceptions and experiences. Results: Quantitative analysis showed significant differences in oral health outcomes between smokers, vapers, and non-users, with smokers displaying the highest rates of inflammatory diseases. Though the vaper group showed marked acquaintance but they expressed smoking as a media of stress reliever or a safer way to withdraw smoking gradually. Qualitative themes revealed stress, social influence, marketing strategy and risk perception as key behavioral drivers in terms of awareness, threat perception and willingness to quit smoking. Conclusion: Smoking and vaping both pose stomatognathic system health problems, with notable differences in outcomes. Targeted prevention strategies addressing biopsychosocial factors are vital to lessen these risks. Clinical Implication: The findings underscore the needfulness for dental practitioners to inform patients on the oral health threat of smoking and vaping, supporting comprehensive preventive care and health policy. Download Full Article.PDF DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14560350 Home About the Joural Journal Committe Instruction to Contributors Archives BJDRE 15(1) Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education official publication of Bangladesh Academy of Dentistry International (BADI)® ISSN (Online): 2308-9733 ISSN (Print): 22259015 ORCiD@BJDRE,BADI® ZENODO@BJDRE,BADI® OpenAIRE | EXPLOR@BJDRE,BADI®

Keywords

E-cigarette, Vaping, Smoking, Oral Health

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
OpenAIRE