
As this paper speaks of ‘human diversity’ it refers not to nuances of sexual orientation, but to all the characteristics that may distinguish each and every human being, that is, to genetic diversity. This paper sheds light on the power or ability of two different chart models to explain the human experience. Because as many as a dozen individuals or more can be born in a 2-hour period at a given place and on a given date, it is necessary for our method of measurement or calculating the birthchart to be able to reflect astrographic differences every 4 min on average, as opposed to every 2 hr on average. Because a sign-house chart (also known as a chart of whole-sign houses) changes only every two hours (less or even more, depending on the latitude), such a system cannot hold explanatory power with regard to the human species, even if one were to take into account both the ascending and culminating degrees, unlike a quadrant-chart model (Placidus, in this case). Whereas whole-sign charts produce one distinction only every two hours on average, quadrant houses no less than 30 (or than 12 under the employment of the micro Zodiac, that is, twelfth parts). As others have also pointed out (e.g. Ralph W. Holden), the Earth’s rotation is the only variable rapid enough to individualise a horoscope.
astronomy, house systems, quadrant houses, epigenetics, Morin de Villefranche, astrological delineation, Hellenistic astrology, Traditional astrology, human science, whole-sign houses, genetics, astrology, ecliptic
astronomy, house systems, quadrant houses, epigenetics, Morin de Villefranche, astrological delineation, Hellenistic astrology, Traditional astrology, human science, whole-sign houses, genetics, astrology, ecliptic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
