
This is the author’s self-archived published version of an article originally published in ISRG Journal of Arts Humanities & Social Sciences. Official citation (please use this when citing): Besigomwe, K. (2024). Administrative Discretion in Uganda: The Role, Impact, and Legal Boundaries. ISRG Journal of Arts Humanities & Social Sciences, 2(4), 170-174. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14469178 Abstract This study was conducted to investigate the nature of administrative discretion in Uganda, examining its scope, legal framework, impact on governance, and its role in ensuring efficient public administration. Administrative discretion refers to the authority granted to public officials, especially in administrative agencies, to make decisions within the scope of their powers and in line with legal provisions. In Uganda, administrative discretion is crucial for the implementation of policies and the execution of public functions. However, while it enables flexibility in decision-making, it also raises concerns about accountability, fairness, and potential abuse. Through in-depth interviews, doctrinal research and empirical analysis, this study involving 60 respondents (public officials, legal experts, and citizens) evaluated how administrative discretion is exercised in Uganda, its legal boundaries, and the mechanisms in place to prevent abuse and ensure accountability. The study findings suggested that, while administrative discretion is essential for effective governance, its unchecked use poses significant risks to fairness, justice, and the protection of human rights. This research consequently offers recommendations for legal and institutional reforms to ensure that administrative decisions are made in accordance with the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights. Copyright and publication note: This article was originally published in ISRG Journal of Arts Humanities & Social Sciences in 2024. Copyright and reuse rights are governed by the original journal publication and its DOI. The new Zenodo record serves only as a self-archived copy for long-term scholarly access. License: All rights reserved.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
