<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Gender Diversity And Team Science. Conceptual Framework.

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Project deliverable , Other literature type 31 May 2016 English Publisher:ZenodoFunded by:EC | GEDII

Authors: Müller, Jörg; Humbert, Anne Laure; Günther, Elisabeth; Sandström, Ulf; Callerstig, Anne-Charlott; Klatt, Sandra;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1442691 , 10.5281/zenodo.1442692

Gender Diversity And Team Science. Conceptual Framework.

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

The following document presents the conceptual framework of the GEDII project. As such it reviews the literature roughly pertaining to three quite separate knowledge fields, namely Team Science (Chapter 1), Research Assessment (Chapter 2) and Gender Research (Chapter 3). Overall, we have proceeded to review first the literature on the main factors that affect team performance, followed by the different ways that research is currently assessed and evaluated. The third chapter then aims to flesh out the gender dimensions of team science and research assessment in order to arrive at an understanding how gender diversity specifically affects team performance. The fourth chapter finally spells out the methodological implications for our case study research, the development of the Gender- Diversity-Index and the survey.

Deliverable 1.1. Conceptual Framework GEDII project.

Related Organizations

Keywords

gender diversity; gender equality; team science; research performance; bibliometrics

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average