Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
InteractiveResource . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
InteractiveResource . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
InteractiveResource . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Promoting SearchSECO through the RSMD Guidelines

Authors: Islam, Aminul Didar; Kumbla, Deekshitha; Jansen, Slinger;

Promoting SearchSECO through the RSMD Guidelines

Abstract

Software plays a crucial role in academic research, not only as a tool for data analysis but also as a research outcome or result, or even the object of research itself. FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) research software can increase the transparency, reproducibility, and reusability of research. For this to happen, software needs to be well-described (by metadata), inspectable, documented and appropriately structured so that it can be executed, replicated, built upon, combined, reinterpreted, reimplemented, and/or used in different settings. The FAIR4RS Principles aim to guide software creators and owners on how to make their software FAIR. FAIR-IMPACT offered two support actions designed to enhance the FAIRness and impact of research software: Assessing and improving existing research software using a new extension of F-UJI which implements some of the metrics for automated FAIR research software assessment. Implementing the Research Software MetaData (RSMD) guidelines for better archiving, referencing, describing, and citing research software artefacts. This FAIR Implementation Story outlines the specific aims and actions of Utrecht University in relation to their participation in the Implementing the Research Software MetaData (RSMD) Guidelines - Path 2 - OC-RSMD-07. "To successfully implement Research Software Metadata (RSMD) guidelines, ensure a clear understanding of the required metadata, engage developers early, and offer training. Automate metadata collection where possible, and use consistent documentation practices to maintain accuracy. Implement iteratively, gather feedback, and align with community standards for interoperability. Collaborate with external communities to stay current with best practices and emerging standards. These steps will enhance the discoverability, reproducibility, and sustainability of research software." Supported applicant: Aminul Didar Islam (aminul.didar@gmail.com), Deekshitha Kumbla (d.kumbla@esciencecenter.nl), Slinger Jansen (slinger.jansen@uu.nl)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
LifeWatch ERIC