Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Quantitative Analysis of Sentiment Expression Across Large Language Models: A Comparative Study Using Plutchik's Wheel of Emotions

Authors: Butler, Raleigh; Ward, Dylan; Jenkins, Dana; Lantrip, A.R.; Armstrong, Erin; Butler, Rory; Driza, Paige; +9 Authors

Quantitative Analysis of Sentiment Expression Across Large Language Models: A Comparative Study Using Plutchik's Wheel of Emotions

Abstract

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have dramatically transformed the landscape of natural language processing, yet our understanding of how these models express and manipulate emotional content remains limited. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of sentiment expression across multiple prominent LLMs, including Llama 8B, Gemini 1.5 Flash, ChatGPT 4, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Using Plutchik's Wheel of Emotions as a theoretical framework, we evaluate how different LLMs express and combine emotional states through generated text. Our analysis employs both LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count) and SALLEE (Syntax-Aware LexicaL Emotion Engine) to quantify emotional expression across 50 text generations per sentiment per model. Results reveal distinctive patterns in how different LLMs handle emotional intensity and emotional combinations, with significant variations in consistency and accuracy across models. These findings have important implications for both practical applications of LLMs and theoretical understanding of artificial emotional expression.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green