
The Niger Delta region of Nigeria has faced extreme environmental degradation and a history of exploitation. Whereas anthropogenic thinking fails to engage with the context correctly, the Capitalocene (Moore, 2015a) offers a framework for understanding crises in the Niger Delta, synthesising the analysis of economic and environmental exploitation. Through an analysis of the exploitation and appropriation of ‘Cheap Nature’ (Moore, 2016a; Moore and Patel, 2017), this article uses the Capitalocene and attendant frameworks (see McBrien, 2016) to present a nuanced understanding of environmental change in the Niger Delta, ‘cheap’ nature inherently produces and reproduces ‘negative value’ (McBrien, 2016, p. 118). It thereby reveals the interconnectedness of environmental, socio-economic, and security breakdowns. It does this through the introduction of Nature as an agent, and capitalist exploitation and security in the Niger Delta are examined, transcending mono-causal explanations of an oil curse theory by examining capitalist exploitation and security in the Niger Delta. The security implications materialise in an understanding of ‘negative value’. Nature is exploited and appropriated to such an extent that it pushes back, characterised by environmental degradation and violent/non-violent resistance.
Nature and Capitalism, Oil curse theory, Anthropogenic thinking, Environmental resistance, Environmental crisis, Exploitation, Economic exploitation, Capitalism, Environmental degradation, Capitalocene, Niger Delta security, Cheap Nature, Capitalist Exploitation, Niger Delta, Negative Value
Nature and Capitalism, Oil curse theory, Anthropogenic thinking, Environmental resistance, Environmental crisis, Exploitation, Economic exploitation, Capitalism, Environmental degradation, Capitalocene, Niger Delta security, Cheap Nature, Capitalist Exploitation, Niger Delta, Negative Value
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
