Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D3.3 Report on GEP Monitoring Survey + Webcrawl Result

Authors: Löther, Andrea; Karataş, Mazlum; Weber, Lena;

D3.3 Report on GEP Monitoring Survey + Webcrawl Result

Abstract

Following the introduction of the eligibility criteria in 2022, which stipulates that research organisations and higher education institutions must have a gender equality plan (GEP) (European Commission 2021b, 12–13), the monitoring of GEPs became a pivotal concern. At present, there is no reliable tool available to monitor GEPs. The present study on the monitoring of GEPs comprises the development of indicators and their application in two different methodological approaches: non-reactive (web scraping and automated text analysis) and reactive (Europe-wide online survey). This report presents the results gathered by both approaches, focusing on the requirements related to the eligibility criterion. In addition to results on the prevalence of GEPs, we present results on publication, dedicated resources, data collection and monitoring, awarenessraising/training as process-related and four areas of activities (work-life balance, gender equality in recruitment and career progression, integration of the gender dimension, measures against gender-based violence) as content-related requirements (European Commission 2021b, 12–13). The sample for both methodological approaches comprises nearly 7,000 research-performing and research-funding organisations in all European member states and six associated countries. Following the removal of incomplete data, the survey was sent out to 4,571 organisations and web scraping was conducted for around 2000 more cases. The field period of the European-wide online survey has been in the summer of 2024.

Keywords

GEP Webcrawl result, quantitative analysis, GEP Monitoring, GEP Prevalence

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Funded by