
The humanities have distinct publication practices compared to the sciences, with books and local language literature being essential. This study aims to identify and analyze the publication patterns of humanities scholars in Spanish-speaking countries, revealing unique publication behaviors and fostering diverse perspectives rather than linear knowledge progression. We analyzed the publication histories of approximately 40,000 scholars from 1950 to 2021 using data from the Dialnet database. By identifying archetypal publication profiles, we explored their distribution across generational cohorts and research topics. Our findings reveal substantial generational shifts towards journal-centric publication patterns probably influenced by bibliometric-driven evaluation systems. The also show a relation between publication patterns and research topics. This highlights the need for more inclusive assessment practices that recognize the diverse nature of humanities scholarship. We contribute to ongoing discussions on promoting bibliodiversity in research assessment and the potential impacts of current policies on the humanities.
This study is part of the COMPARE project, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, MCIN/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033 FSE invierte en tu futuro, (Ref:PID2020-117007RA-I00). Nicolas Robinson-Garcia is currently supported by a Ramón y Cajal grant funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science (Ref: RYC2019-027886-I).
Spanish Ministry of Science PID2020-117007RA-I00, RYC2019-027886-I
research evaluation, generational shifts, Spanish-speaking countries, Dialnet, Research evaluation, Publication Patterns, publication patterns, Multilingualism, bibliodiversity, humanities
research evaluation, generational shifts, Spanish-speaking countries, Dialnet, Research evaluation, Publication Patterns, publication patterns, Multilingualism, bibliodiversity, humanities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
