Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Guidelines on The Ethical Use of ChatGPT or Baidu Among University Students in Xinjiang, China

Authors: Choon Keong, Tan1*, Honggang, Shi2;

Guidelines on The Ethical Use of ChatGPT or Baidu Among University Students in Xinjiang, China

Abstract

With an emphasis on important ethical aspects, this study investigates the connection between students' academic achievement and the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics and Compliance Model. It's crucial to comprehend how AI technologies like ChatGPT and Baidu (China’s version of ChatGPT) conform to ethical standards given their growing usage in educational settings. Student privacy, data governance, fairness, accountability, transparency, explainability, and reproducibility are among the dimensions of the AI Ethics and Compliance Model that are being looked at. These dimensions were picked in order to evaluate how the AI ethical practices affect students' attitudes and actions, which in turn affect their academic performance. Three hundred and thirty-five students from two universities in Xinjiang, China, participated in the study by answering a questionnaire. Students' opinions on the ethical behaviour of AI systems and their personal obligations when utilising these tools were revealed by the data collected. The findings demonstrate students' favourable perceptions of all ethical dimensions and show that mean ratings for dimensions like explainability (4.417) and student accountability (4.413) are high. Students usually believe that employing AI tools has improved their academic performance, as evidenced by the mean score of 4.510 for self-evaluated academic achievement. Only student privacy was identified as a statistically significant predictor of academic achievement (p = 0.033) among the six variables that were analysed, according to the regression analysis. According to this positive relationship (B = 0.229), students are more likely to give their academic achievement higher ratings when they believe that privacy requirements are being upheld when they use AI tools. According to the findings, ethical compliance supports improved academic performance and increases students' faith in AI, which emphasises the necessity of ongoing evaluation of AI tools in educational institutions. This study recommends that universities must enhance AI tool privacy, promote transparency, encourage responsible usage, and train students on ethical guidelines to prevent misuse and ensure academic integrity. KEY WORDS: AI ethics, student privacy, data governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!