Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Study of Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy in South Karnataka Population

Authors: Asha Malladad; Girish Malladad;

Study of Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy in South Karnataka Population

Abstract

Background: The risk factors for GDM are high BMI, nutritional intake, long-term use of contraceptives, physical inactivity, and hyperthyroidism. If not managed meticulously, it may cause morbidity and mortality for both mothers and newborns. Method: 54 diabetic pregnant women were studied with classifying first trimester pregnancy, second trimester pregnancy, and third trimester pregnancy – HbA1C BUN1 TSH, Urine protein to creatinine ratio, USG, with different intervals to assess the viability and fetal umbilical Doppler for fetal movements. Results: 22 (40.7%) had pre-existing diabetes, 32 (59.2%) had GDM. The types of pregnancy were 19 (35.1%) multigravida, 35 (64.8%) primi gravida. The types of delivery were 35 (64.8%) had LSCS, 19 (35.1%) had spontaneous vaginal delivery, 2 (3.7%) hydrocephalus, congenital heart anomalies, still births and macrosomia were studied. Conclusion: The present pragmatic study will be helpful to obstetricians and gynecologists to treat such pa-tients efficiently to avoid morbidity and mortality in mother and fetus.

Background: The risk factors for GDM are high BMI, nutritional intake, long-term use of contraceptives, physical inactivity, and hyperthyroidism. If not managed meticulously, it may cause morbidity and mortality for both mothers and newborns. Method: 54 diabetic pregnant women were studied with classifying first trimester pregnancy, second trimester pregnancy, and third trimester pregnancy – HbA1C BUN1 TSH, Urine protein to creatinine ratio, USG, with different intervals to assess the viability and fetal umbilical Doppler for fetal movements. Results: 22 (40.7%) had pre-existing diabetes, 32 (59.2%) had GDM. The types of pregnancy were 19 (35.1%) multigravida, 35 (64.8%) primi gravida. The types of delivery were 35 (64.8%) had LSCS, 19 (35.1%) had spontaneous vaginal delivery, 2 (3.7%) hydrocephalus, congenital heart anomalies, still births and macrosomia were studied. Conclusion: The present pragmatic study will be helpful to obstetricians and gynecologists to treat such pa-tients efficiently to avoid morbidity and mortality in mother and fetus.

Keywords

Gestational And Diabetes, Pre-Existing Diabetes, Fetal Outcome, Maternal Outcome, HbA1C

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green