
The vast amount of observations needed to train new generation AI models (Foundation Models) necessitates a strategy of combining data from multiple repositories in a semi-automatic way to minimize human involvement. However, many public data sources present challenges such as inhomogeneity, lack of machine-actionable data, and manual access barriers. These issues can be mitigated through the consequent adherence to the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles, as well as state-of-the-art data standards and tools. In the poster, we highlight the inhomogeneity of the schema definitions in the field, provide helpful tips on what could improve the AI-readiness of data and inspect example data sources which implement the most novel concepts in working with data and metadata in the machine-actionable fashion.
Artificial intelligence, Academies and Institutes/statistics & numerical data, Work Performance/statistics & numerical data, Abstracting and Indexing/statistics & numerical data, Work Performance/statistics & numerical data, Data exchange, Abstracting and Indexing/statistics & numerical data, Cognitive Neuroscience/statistics & numerical data, Bioimaging, Academies and Institutes/statistics & numerical data, Cognitive Neuroscience/statistics & numerical data
Artificial intelligence, Academies and Institutes/statistics & numerical data, Work Performance/statistics & numerical data, Abstracting and Indexing/statistics & numerical data, Work Performance/statistics & numerical data, Data exchange, Abstracting and Indexing/statistics & numerical data, Cognitive Neuroscience/statistics & numerical data, Bioimaging, Academies and Institutes/statistics & numerical data, Cognitive Neuroscience/statistics & numerical data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
