
This document presents the third policy briefing of the UNTWIST project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARYAcross Europe, right wing populist actors are mobilising anti-gender equality agendas that threaten the fundamental values of democratic society. In order for other political parties to develop well-informed policies that foster gender equality and counter right-wing populist narratives, they need reliable empirical data on voters’ gender-based needs and demands. This brief highlights the importance of securing valid and reliable public opinion data to understand the full spectrum of citizen’s gender-based needs and demands. We conducted large-scale empirical analysis of survey questions relating to sex/gender in well-established public opinion instruments across 20 years in Europe. We expose important gaps in how public opinion surveys currently measure voters’ gender-based needs and outline the implications. Key findings:● Public opinion data regarding gender-based needs predominantly focus on the areas of discrimination, family, and the labour market.● Measurement is much weaker in important policy areas such as education, healthcare, law and order, and transnational issues including immigration.● Measurement on certain gender-based needs is not regularly captured over time and may be out of date.● Many public opinion instruments do not include a measure of party affiliation/vote choice, meaning we cannot learn about the gender-based attitudes of different groups of voters.● Sample sizes of voters of populist radical right parties are often too low to provide reliable generalisation to the wider voting population.
Gender inequality, untwist project, FOS: Social sciences, Public policies, Social sciences, Opinion survey, FOS: Sociology, Gender equality, Sociology, Public Opinion, Gender studies, Political sciences
Gender inequality, untwist project, FOS: Social sciences, Public policies, Social sciences, Opinion survey, FOS: Sociology, Gender equality, Sociology, Public Opinion, Gender studies, Political sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
