Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Data from: Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus and Enterococcus bacteria in rural dogs in Hungary - a preliminary report

Authors: Csivincsik, Ágnes;

Data from: Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus and Enterococcus bacteria in rural dogs in Hungary - a preliminary report

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most relevant health challenges globally. Since resistant bacteria and their resistance genes circulate through the ecosystem, AMR is among the main focuses of One Health. Dogs are the best friends of humans, therefore their relationships with the owners are mostly very close. This connection can make the dogs vehicles of AMR between the environment and humans. Based on this hypothesis, we investigated faecal samples from 37 dogs in Inner Somogy, Hungary. We isolated and investigated for antibiotic susceptibility 21 and 6 strains of Staphylococcus and Enterococcus genera, respectively. Among staphylococci and enterococci, 12 and 3 strains proved to be resistant to at least one antibiotic. Multidrug resistant strains were detected only among coagulase negative staphylococci, mainly in S. sciuri species. The antibiotics that proved to be inefficient against the most strains were benzylpenicillin (8 strains), moxifloxacin (6 strains), clindamycin (5 S. sciuri strains), and fusidic acid (12 strains). In the case of moxifloxacin and fusidic acid, the MIC excessed the EUCAST clinical breakpoint. Analysing the epidemiological background of the animals, outdoors keeping and higher income level of the owners seemed risk factors of AMR carrying, though the sample size of this study could not confirm statistically the apparent interdependence.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average