Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Comparative Study on the Accuracy and Consistency of Tooth Shade Assessment Using Digital and Visual Methods

Authors: Tofail, Towhid; Haque, Samiul; Islam, Salma; Zaki, Mohammed Mahbub; Awal, Md. Abdul; Khan, Md. Haider Ali;

A Comparative Study on the Accuracy and Consistency of Tooth Shade Assessment Using Digital and Visual Methods

Abstract

Abstarct Introduction: Tooth shade assessment is a fundamental aspect of modern dentistry, playing a pivotal role in both cosmetic and restorative procedures. Achieving precise color matching is essential for ensuring aesthetically pleasing outcomes in various dental treatments, including crowns, veneers, and fillings.Aim of the study: This study aims to compare the accuracy and consistency of tooth shade assessment using digital and visual methods.Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at Ibrahim Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh, over a six-month period from January 2022 to June 2022.Result: In the assessment of tooth shade of right canine, the digital method predominantly identified shade D2 in 57.9% of cases, while the visual method revealed a broader spectrum of shades, with shade A2 being the most common at 32.3%. In our study, the digital method demonstrated a strong preference for certain tooth shade of left canine, such as D2 (54.1%), which indicates potential limitations in the device's ability to differentiate between similar shades. In contrast, the visual method showed a broader range of shade identification, with A1 (25.6%) and A2 (35.3%) being more prevalent. This broader range may suggest that visual methods, while less precise, can be more flexible in capturing a variety of shades. Notably, significant differences were observed between the two methods: the digital method underrepresented shade A2 and overrepresented shade D2 compared to the visual method. This discrepancy underscores the variations in shade identification between digital and visual approaches.Conclusion: The study highlights that while digital methods offer more consistent shade identification for specific shades, visual methods provide a broader range of shade assessments. Download Full Article.PDF DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14201970 Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education official publication of Bangladesh Academy of Dentistry International (BADI)® ISSN (Online): 2308-9733 ISSN (Print): 2225-9015 ZENODO@BJDRE,BADI® OpenAIRE | EXPLOR@BJDRE,BADI® ORCiD@BJDRE,BADI® 

Keywords

Shade Discrepancy, Tooth Shade Assessment, Visual Shade Guide, Digital vs Visual Methods, , Digital Shade Matching

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
OpenAIRE