
This document is based on a previously set up guidance document and aims to provide guidance that can stimulate taking into account Open Science practices during assessment interviews (such as annual reviews). The document was revised with the Open Science Team members, and discussed in the Management Team of the Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology (the Netherlands), after it was further improved. This version will be used in future Open Science Team meetings to ensure the guidance is more targeted and practically actionable. Note that this is currently not an active or officially endorsed document by the faculty!
TNW, Open Science, Open Methods, Open Data, Recognition and Rewards, Open Software, FAIR
TNW, Open Science, Open Methods, Open Data, Recognition and Rewards, Open Software, FAIR
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
