Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Automated Speech Act Annotation in a Russian Spoken Corpus Using Large Language Models: A Comparative Study

Authors: Sherstinova, Tatiana; Firsanova, Viktoria; Novoseltseva, Alena; Megre, Mariya; Savchenko, Egor;

Automated Speech Act Annotation in a Russian Spoken Corpus Using Large Language Models: A Comparative Study

Abstract

The research focuses on the automatic annotation of a linguistic corpus using large language models (LLMs). Annotating a corpus is a crucial step in its creation, as it determines the practical scope and applications of the resource being developed. This study explores the annotation of oral speech transcripts at the pragmatic level using speech acts that reflect the speaker's intent and purpose. Typically, this task is performed manually by experts, which greatly limits the volume of annotated data that can be produced. In this work, an attempt was made to automatically annotate speech acts using five LLMs commonly used for processing Russian texts – ChatGPT, GigaCHAT, YandexGPT, Mistral, and Gemini. A comparative analysis of the automatic annotation results was conducted, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each model. . The findings suggest that employing LLMs for corpus annotation is a promising approach, with ChatGPT and Gemini demonstrating particular effectiveness in speech act categorization. However, for Russian, language-specific models like GigaCHAT and YandexGPT are preferred when language-specific information is needed.

Keywords

spoken speech pragmatics corpus linguistics speech acts pragmatic annotation LLMs

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green