Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Table 1 in Revision of the montane New Guinean skink genus Lobulia (Squamata: Scincidae), with the description of four new genera and nine new species

Authors: Slavenko, Alex; Tamar, Karin; Tallowin, Oliver J S; Kraus, Fred; Allison, Allen; Carranza, Salvador; Meiri, Shai;

Table 1 in Revision of the montane New Guinean skink genus Lobulia (Squamata: Scincidae), with the description of four new genera and nine new species

Abstract

Table 1. Ranges of morphometrics and meristics for specimens of species treated in this study (mean values in parentheses). Only adult specimens were examined for morphometric measurements, but juveniles were included for meristics SpeciesN (adult)N (total)SVL (mm)Forelimb length (% of SVL)Hindlimb length (% of SVL)Midbody scale rowsParavertebralsSubdigital lamellaeSingle supradigital scalesNubeoscincus (Clade I)N. glacialis5547.4–58.0 (52.4)32.2–34.4% (33.1%)34.6–38.6% (37.1%)34–36 (34.6)66–70 (67.6)13–16 (14.8)2–3 (2.4)N. stellaris1150.928.7%36.2%3675142Prasinohaema (Clade II)Pr. flavipes2259.7–85.3 (72.5)30.1–30.4% (30.3%)33.5–34.1% (33.8%)38–39 (38.5)66–69 (67.5)17–20 (18.5)3–4 (3.5)Pr. prehensicauda2257.2–64.5 (60.9)27.7–31.4% (29.5%)29.9–33.3% (31.6%)38–45 (41.5)70–92 (81)17–18 (17.5)3–4 (3.5)Lobulia (Clade III)Lo. brongersmai1148.743.2%49.7%3051224Lo. elegans1155.734.5%44.6%3155193Lo. fortis212945.7–60.5 (53.6)40.6–47.6% (43.3%)46.0–54.8% (50.2%)34–37 (35.3)55–65 (58.9)20–25 (22.9)3–5 (3.5)Lo. huonensis171945.2–63.9 (54.0)37.7–43.6% (42.1%)46.1–51.9% (49.8%)33–38 (36.2)59–68 (62.7)19–25 (21.3)3–4 (3.1)Lo. lobulus51042.5–55.8 (52.2)32.9–41.6% (39.6%)42.0–51.5% (47.7%)32–40 (35.3)54–61 (57.7)19–24 (21)3–7 (4)Lo. marmorata293341.9–56.9 (48.1)36.8–47.0% (42.4%)44.1–53.4% (47.5%)30–34 (31.5)46–56 (51.2)20–25 (22.5)3–4 (3.2)Lobulia sp. Muller1157.241.3%48.6%3563213RangeLo. vogelkopensis3356–58.3 (57.4)35.7–41.3% (37.7%)41.6–47.8% (45.0%)34–36 (35.0)69–77 (72.7)19–23 (21)3–4 (3.3)Palaia (Clade IV)Pal. pulchra8837.3–41.2 (39.2)29.9–34.4% (32.0%)36.7–43.8% (40.5%)23–25 (23.9)42–48 (44.3)19–21 (20.0)7–8 (7.6)Papuascincus (Clade V)Lineage I15419841.2–56.7 (50.4)28.1–37.1% (32.9%)36.8–46.1% (41.3%)25–43 (29.9)46–71 (60.1)19–28 (23.3)3–13 (9.1)Lineage II131336.6–48.1 (45.0)28.1–35.5% (31.8%)38.3–45.4% (42.2%)26–32 (29.8)52–58 (54.2)24–29 (25.7)10–13 (11.5)Lineage III9511236.3–57.9 (47.0)25.1–36.8% (31.8%)33.6–47.4% (41.3%)24–36 (28.2)45–67 (52.3)15–26 (22.2)7–15 (11.9)Lineage IV8313644.4–63.7 (55.9)27.8–38.6% (32.9%)38.8–48.8% (43.2%)24–41 (30.4)57–76 (66.0)18–27 (22.8)7–14 (11.0)Lineage V667942.6–52.9 (48.8)27.9–35.9% (32.1%)34.8–46% (40.1%)26–42 (29.0)50–64 (55.1)19–24 (21.3)8–14 (11.7)Lineage VI252851.6–65.3 (60.5)29.4–36.3% (33.6%)37.4–46.5% (41.5%)29–42 (32.7)59–72 (65.6)21–27 (24.1)8–14 (10.8)Lineage VII234445.3–62.6 (56.7)31.2–37.8% (34.7%)38.3–46.5% (44.0%)28–35 (30.2)55–69 (60.7)21–28 (23.8)8–12 (9.9)Lineage VIII9012845.3–67.8 (58.6)29.1–38.9% (34.8%)39.2–49.6% (44.0%)28–38 (32.9)58–79 (68.1)21–29 (25.1)6–14 (10.5)Lineage IX354043.2–65.6 (59.8)30.3–36.8% (33.9%)39.5–47.3% (44.1%)31–51 (35.4)67–83 (73.6)21–26 (24.1)8–11 (9.5)Pap. morokanus2242.9–45.6 (44.2)29.1–30.8% (29.9%)39.1–41.7% (40.4%)28–29 (28.5)44–50 (47.0)23–24 (23.5)6–7 (6.5)Pap. stanleyanus1157.931.4%42.9%31642311Alpinoscincus (Clade VI)A. alpinus91046.1–64.7 (56.5)27.0–38.0% (33.2%)31.7–46.1% (41.0%)37–51 (44.6)70–89 78.9)12–19 (15.7)4–9 (6.5)A. subalpinus374346.5–72.7 (58.2)30.0–39.8% (35.7%)40.4–48.7% (44.4%)35–44 (38.4)64–84 (74.9)18–23 (19.2)3–10 (5.7)Ornithuroscincus (Clade VII)O. bengaun1148.236.3%47.3%3055206O. inornatus1147.932.7%41.2%3551213O. noctua Morobe 11129.431.9%41.7%2449236

Published as part of Slavenko, Alex, Tamar, Karin, Tallowin, Oliver J S, Kraus, Fred, Allison, Allen, Carranza, Salvador & Meiri, Shai, 2022, Revision of the montane New Guinean skink genus Lobulia (Squamata: Scincidae), with the description of four new genera and nine new species, pp. 229 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 195 (1) on page 229, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab052, http://zenodo.org/record/6530695

Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center