
Table 1. Ranges of morphometrics and meristics for specimens of species treated in this study (mean values in parentheses). Only adult specimens were examined for morphometric measurements, but juveniles were included for meristics SpeciesN (adult)N (total)SVL (mm)Forelimb length (% of SVL)Hindlimb length (% of SVL)Midbody scale rowsParavertebralsSubdigital lamellaeSingle supradigital scalesNubeoscincus (Clade I)N. glacialis5547.4–58.0 (52.4)32.2–34.4% (33.1%)34.6–38.6% (37.1%)34–36 (34.6)66–70 (67.6)13–16 (14.8)2–3 (2.4)N. stellaris1150.928.7%36.2%3675142Prasinohaema (Clade II)Pr. flavipes2259.7–85.3 (72.5)30.1–30.4% (30.3%)33.5–34.1% (33.8%)38–39 (38.5)66–69 (67.5)17–20 (18.5)3–4 (3.5)Pr. prehensicauda2257.2–64.5 (60.9)27.7–31.4% (29.5%)29.9–33.3% (31.6%)38–45 (41.5)70–92 (81)17–18 (17.5)3–4 (3.5)Lobulia (Clade III)Lo. brongersmai1148.743.2%49.7%3051224Lo. elegans1155.734.5%44.6%3155193Lo. fortis212945.7–60.5 (53.6)40.6–47.6% (43.3%)46.0–54.8% (50.2%)34–37 (35.3)55–65 (58.9)20–25 (22.9)3–5 (3.5)Lo. huonensis171945.2–63.9 (54.0)37.7–43.6% (42.1%)46.1–51.9% (49.8%)33–38 (36.2)59–68 (62.7)19–25 (21.3)3–4 (3.1)Lo. lobulus51042.5–55.8 (52.2)32.9–41.6% (39.6%)42.0–51.5% (47.7%)32–40 (35.3)54–61 (57.7)19–24 (21)3–7 (4)Lo. marmorata293341.9–56.9 (48.1)36.8–47.0% (42.4%)44.1–53.4% (47.5%)30–34 (31.5)46–56 (51.2)20–25 (22.5)3–4 (3.2)Lobulia sp. Muller1157.241.3%48.6%3563213RangeLo. vogelkopensis3356–58.3 (57.4)35.7–41.3% (37.7%)41.6–47.8% (45.0%)34–36 (35.0)69–77 (72.7)19–23 (21)3–4 (3.3)Palaia (Clade IV)Pal. pulchra8837.3–41.2 (39.2)29.9–34.4% (32.0%)36.7–43.8% (40.5%)23–25 (23.9)42–48 (44.3)19–21 (20.0)7–8 (7.6)Papuascincus (Clade V)Lineage I15419841.2–56.7 (50.4)28.1–37.1% (32.9%)36.8–46.1% (41.3%)25–43 (29.9)46–71 (60.1)19–28 (23.3)3–13 (9.1)Lineage II131336.6–48.1 (45.0)28.1–35.5% (31.8%)38.3–45.4% (42.2%)26–32 (29.8)52–58 (54.2)24–29 (25.7)10–13 (11.5)Lineage III9511236.3–57.9 (47.0)25.1–36.8% (31.8%)33.6–47.4% (41.3%)24–36 (28.2)45–67 (52.3)15–26 (22.2)7–15 (11.9)Lineage IV8313644.4–63.7 (55.9)27.8–38.6% (32.9%)38.8–48.8% (43.2%)24–41 (30.4)57–76 (66.0)18–27 (22.8)7–14 (11.0)Lineage V667942.6–52.9 (48.8)27.9–35.9% (32.1%)34.8–46% (40.1%)26–42 (29.0)50–64 (55.1)19–24 (21.3)8–14 (11.7)Lineage VI252851.6–65.3 (60.5)29.4–36.3% (33.6%)37.4–46.5% (41.5%)29–42 (32.7)59–72 (65.6)21–27 (24.1)8–14 (10.8)Lineage VII234445.3–62.6 (56.7)31.2–37.8% (34.7%)38.3–46.5% (44.0%)28–35 (30.2)55–69 (60.7)21–28 (23.8)8–12 (9.9)Lineage VIII9012845.3–67.8 (58.6)29.1–38.9% (34.8%)39.2–49.6% (44.0%)28–38 (32.9)58–79 (68.1)21–29 (25.1)6–14 (10.5)Lineage IX354043.2–65.6 (59.8)30.3–36.8% (33.9%)39.5–47.3% (44.1%)31–51 (35.4)67–83 (73.6)21–26 (24.1)8–11 (9.5)Pap. morokanus2242.9–45.6 (44.2)29.1–30.8% (29.9%)39.1–41.7% (40.4%)28–29 (28.5)44–50 (47.0)23–24 (23.5)6–7 (6.5)Pap. stanleyanus1157.931.4%42.9%31642311Alpinoscincus (Clade VI)A. alpinus91046.1–64.7 (56.5)27.0–38.0% (33.2%)31.7–46.1% (41.0%)37–51 (44.6)70–89 78.9)12–19 (15.7)4–9 (6.5)A. subalpinus374346.5–72.7 (58.2)30.0–39.8% (35.7%)40.4–48.7% (44.4%)35–44 (38.4)64–84 (74.9)18–23 (19.2)3–10 (5.7)Ornithuroscincus (Clade VII)O. bengaun1148.236.3%47.3%3055206O. inornatus1147.932.7%41.2%3551213O. noctua Morobe 11129.431.9%41.7%2449236
Published as part of Slavenko, Alex, Tamar, Karin, Tallowin, Oliver J S, Kraus, Fred, Allison, Allen, Carranza, Salvador & Meiri, Shai, 2022, Revision of the montane New Guinean skink genus Lobulia (Squamata: Scincidae), with the description of four new genera and nine new species, pp. 229 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 195 (1) on page 229, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab052, http://zenodo.org/record/6530695
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
