
Purpose These data can be used to test my tool delfies on real data, to get a concrete sense of its inputs/outputs and test that it is properly installed. Description Genome I downloaded the genome of Oscheius onirici, accession: GCA_932521025. I subsampled the genome to the last 2kbp of chromosome I, which contains an elimination breakpoint, using `seqkit` v2.8.2, giving the FASTA file in this release. Sequencing data I then downloaded the following sequencing data for *O. onirici*, from the European Nucleotide Archive: ERR5967937: Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paired end short reads. Reads are 2x150bp with average per-base quality of Q27. ERR10796202: Oxford Nanopore PromethION long reads. Reads have average length 11.9kbp and average per-base quality Q11.4. ERR7979900: Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) Sequel II long reads. Reads have average length 11.1kbp and average per-base quality Q28. And aligned them to the above genome with `minimap2` version 2.26-r1175, using the following presets: "map-ont" for the Nanopore data, "map-hifi" for the PacBio data, "sr" for the Illumina data. After sorting with `samtools`, this gives the BAM files in this release. Running delfies I then ran `delfies` version 0.6.0 on each BAM and genome, as: ```shdelfies --threads 16 \ --telo_forward_seq TTAGGC \ --breakpoint_type all \ --min_mapq 20 \ --min_supporting_reads 6 \ \${genome} \${bam} \${odirname}``` The three resulting output directories are in this release, prefixed with `delfies_`. A single, identical breakpoint is found using all three BAMs (see files '*breakpoint_locations.bed'). Data source The above raw data were produced and released by the Wellcome Sanger Institute as part of projects PRJEB51305 and PRJEB59023.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Bioinformatics, Genomics
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Bioinformatics, Genomics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
