Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

OPUS Deliverable 4.2 Mutual Learning Exercise on the Pilots-Initial

Authors: Irimia, Alina Elena; Vega Rubio, Raquel; Trif, Ioana; Ciobotaru, Raluca; Sachetti, Gabriela;

OPUS Deliverable 4.2 Mutual Learning Exercise on the Pilots-Initial

Abstract

The OPUS project is developing coordination and support measures for organisations to reform research assessment with a focus on recognising and rewarding researchers who contribute to Open Science (OS). The main aim of the project is to develop a framework for researcher assessment, consisting of indicators with a focus on OS, and corresponding interventions for organisations to implement the framework. The framework i.e., the Researcher Assessment Framework, hereafter the RAF and its supporting interventions will be tested in pilots and refined in consultation with the research community. The RAF provides a first draft of a framework that offers a comprehensive suite of indicators and metrics for research-performing organisations (RPOs) to assess researchers in an academic context. This includes assessing researchers applying for positions at an RPO, assessing researchers in their career development and progression at an RPO, and assessing project applications and progression by researchers at an RPO or research-funding organisation (RFO). The framework includes an Open Science dimension, whereby Open Science practices are explicitly recognised and rewarded. The implementation of the framework is supported by accompanying interventions for RPOs and RFOs. Greater insights on the first draft of the RAF and its related interventions to support its implementation at RPOs and RFOs can be found in deliverable D3.1 on Indicators and Metrics to Test in the Pilots, and D2.1 on Interventions to Test in the Pilots. The three RPOs (UNL, UCY, and UNIRI) and two RFOs (UEFISCDI and RCL) have selected and tailored indicators from D3.1 and corresponding interventions from D2.1 to test in each of their pilots.

This deliverable is awaiting review by the EC.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average