
This new tool, designed by DIAMAS to promote quality in Diamond open access OA publishing, enables publishers to evaluate their compliance with high-quality Diamond OA standards, providing a clear pathway to enhancing their publishing practices. Institutions can use this resource to identify strengths and weaknesses, facilitating improvement towards Diamond OA-level publishing standards. Serving as both a technical guide and a practical benchmarking resource, DOAS combines comprehensive guidelines with a self-assessment tool to elevate standards in scholarly publishing. The presentation was delivered at an online workshop organised by for UK and Irish open access publishers on Tuesday, 5 November (3 - 4.30 p.m.). It was a hands-on session where attendees received expert guidance and support completing the Diamond OA Standard (DOAS) self-assessment tool. Members of the DIAMAS team were on hand to answer questions about DOAS and troubleshoot any issues attendees are experiencing. The newly launched multi-lingual toolsuite, including guidelines, was also promoted to attendees.
Diamond Open Access Diamond model, DOAS, Diamond OA Standard, Institutional Publisher Service Provider, European Research Area
Diamond Open Access Diamond model, DOAS, Diamond OA Standard, Institutional Publisher Service Provider, European Research Area
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
