Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

The moral commitment problem, moral emotions, and moral judgments. An evolutionary analysis.

Authors: De Buck, Ann; Pauwels, Lieven;

The moral commitment problem, moral emotions, and moral judgments. An evolutionary analysis.

Abstract

This presentation provides an overview of an integrated theoretical model firmly rooted in a gene-culture coevolutionary framework, which addresses empathy, moral intuitions, and moral emotions such as anticipated anger and guilt as solutions to moral commitment problems—commonly understood as failures to cooperate. Building on previous research, we examine the relationships between three key commitment problems—stealing, breaking promises, and punishing free riders—and moral intuitions, moral emotions, and moral judgments (i.e. judgments about the wrongness of rule-breaking). Rule violations and punishment decisions can be interpreted as (conditional or alternative) behavioral strategies. In line with the work of Frank, Tomasello, de Waal, and Haidt, we propose that moral intuitions and emotions function as moral commitment devices that promote social cohesion within groups. This study emphasizes the role of proximate mechanisms, including empathy, altruistic preferences, anticipated guilt, and moral indignation, in explaining individual differences in moral judgments and intentions related to stealing, punishing free riders, and breaking promises. Our results are based on a large-scale survey of Flemish young adults (N = 1496). The implications of these findings and directions for future research will be discussed. References Al-Shawaf, L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2024). The Oxford handbook of evolution and the emotions. Oxford University Press. Alexander, R.D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. Routledge. Davis, K.L., Panksepp J. (2018). The emotional foundations of personality. A neurobiological and evolutionary approach. W.W.Norton. De Buck, A., & Pauwels, L.J.R. (2022). Explaining judgments on rule violations. On empathy, moral intuitions, and emotions. Springer Nature. De Buck, A., & Pauwels, L.J.R. (forthcoming 2025). Breaking shared norms, the moral commitment problem, and moral emotions. An evolutionary analysis. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. De Waal, F.B.M. (2009). The age of empathy. Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. Three Rivers Press. Frank, R. (1988). Passions within reason. The strategic role of the emotions. W.W. Norton & Company. Greene, J. D. (2013). Moral tribes: emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. Penguin. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage. Nesse, R.M. (Ed.) (2001). Evolution and the capacity for commitment. Russell Sage Foundation. Nesse, R. M. (2000). How selfish genes shape moral passions. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7(1-2), 227-231. Trivers, R. (2011). The Folly of Fools. The logic of deceit and self-deception in human life. Basic Books. Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Harvard University Press. Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Harvard University Press.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green