Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Information and Soft...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Information and Software Technology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
DBLP
Article . 2025
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Industry 4.0/IIoT Platforms for manufacturing systems — A systematic review contrasting the scientific and the industrial side

Authors: Eichelberger, Holger; Sauer, Christian Severin; Ahmadian, Amir Shayan; Kröher, Christian;

Industry 4.0/IIoT Platforms for manufacturing systems — A systematic review contrasting the scientific and the industrial side

Abstract

[Context] IIoT, Industry 4.0 or CPPS software platforms are cornerstones of smart manufacturing production systems. Such platforms integrate machines, IIoT and edge devices, realize distributed (management) functionality and provide the basis for user-defined IIoT applications. Individual instances in research and industrial practice do share commonalities while they also differ significantly. [Objective] A detailed overview of the platform landscape is fundamental for innovative research. However, actual surveys and literature reviews concentrate on specific aspects and usually focus only on the research works, neglecting specific aspects of the industrial use of IIoT platforms. We aim at a systematic overview of the functionalities and approaches of scientific and industrial IIoT platforms along 16 analysis dimensions and thereby exposing gaps between the focuses of research on IIoT platforms and actual industrial IIoT platforms in use. By doing so we are able to highlight future areas of interest to research as well as indicating potentially over-researched areas which are of less interest in actual industrial IIoT platforms. [Method] We combine a systematic literature review of scientific IIoT platform research with a systematic analysis of industrial IIoT platforms. [Results] We start off with 1620 research papers plus 70 from snowballing that we systematically filter down to 36 papers providing sufficient information for a data extraction, which we analyze along 16 topics to extract actual capabilities and differences of relevant platform approaches. In a second step, we contrast these results with an analysis of 21 industrial platforms. [Conclusions] Similar approaches, differences and topics for future are exhibited. In comparison with 21 industrial platforms along the same analysis topics, we distill various commonalities, differences, trends and gaps. This artifact contains the evaluation material/replication package for the paper mentioned above published in the IST Journal under https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107650.

Keywords

Industrial Internet of Things, platform, SLR, systematic literature review, CPPS, Cyber-Physical Production Systems, IIoT, Industry 4.0, software platform

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green
hybrid