Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Postoperative Pain Management in Gynecologic Surgery: Evaluating the Role of Multimodal Anesthesia

Authors: Saba Musharaf; Heena Chowdhary; Salma Mariyam; Irm Yasmeen; Rohey Jan;

Postoperative Pain Management in Gynecologic Surgery: Evaluating the Role of Multimodal Anesthesia

Abstract

Background: Effective postoperative pain management is crucial in gynecologic surgery to enhance patient recovery and satisfaction. Multimodal anesthesia uses a combination of analgesic techniques to improve pain relief, reduce opioid use, and speed up recovery. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal anesthesia in reducing pain, opioid consumption, and adverse effects in patients undergoing gynecologic surgeries. Methods: A prospective study was conducted with 100 patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgeries. Patients were divided into two groups: one receiving multimodal anesthesia and the other receiving traditional opioid-based analgesia. Data on pain scores, opioid use, adverse effects, and recovery milestones were collected. Results: Patients in the multimodal group experienced significantly lower pain scores, reduced opioid use, and fewer side effects compared to the traditional analgesia group. Conclusion: Multimodal anesthesia provides superior pain control, minimizes opioid requirements, and enhances recovery, making it a preferable approach for managing postoperative pain in gynecologic surgeries.

Background: Effective postoperative pain management is crucial in gynecologic surgery to enhance patient recovery and satisfaction. Multimodal anesthesia uses a combination of analgesic techniques to improve pain relief, reduce opioid use, and speed up recovery. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal anesthesia in reducing pain, opioid consumption, and adverse effects in patients undergoing gynecologic surgeries. Methods: A prospective study was conducted with 100 patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgeries. Patients were divided into two groups: one receiving multimodal anesthesia and the other receiving traditional opioid-based analgesia. Data on pain scores, opioid use, adverse effects, and recovery milestones were collected. Results: Patients in the multimodal group experienced significantly lower pain scores, reduced opioid use, and fewer side effects compared to the traditional analgesia group. Conclusion: Multimodal anesthesia provides superior pain control, minimizes opioid requirements, and enhances recovery, making it a preferable approach for managing postoperative pain in gynecologic surgeries.

Keywords

Multimodal anesthesia, Postoperative pain management, Gynecologic surgery, Opioid-sparing strategies, regional anesthesia, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Pain control, Patient outcomes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green