Downloads provided by UsageCounts
We report the first comparison of ground and satellite measurements of low-latitude traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs). Three TID events were simultaneously observed by a 630-nm airglow imager and the CHAMP satellite on April 30, 2006 (event 1), September 28, 2006 (event 2), and April 12, 2004 (event 3) at Kototabang, Indonesia (geographic coordinates: 0.2$^\circ$S, 100.3$^\circ$E, geomagnetic latitude: 10.6$^\circ$S). In 630-nm airglow images of all three events, there are clear southward-moving structures. Events 1 and 2 are a single pulse with horizontal scales of $\sim$500--1000 km. Event 3 shows five wave fronts with a horizontal scale size of 500--1000 km. All three TIDs are medium-scale TIDs. Horizontal wavelengths of both airglow intensity at an average emission altitude of 250 km and CHAMP neutral density variations measured at 400 km are estimated by fitting a sinusoidal function to the observed data. For events 1 and 3, estimated horizontal wavelengths are nearly equal, indicating both instruments are observing the same wave. For event 1, the CHAMP electron density mapped along the geomagnetic field line onto the airglow altitude does not show wave structure similar to the airglow variation. For events 2 and 3, the relationship of electron density and airglow intensity is unclear. These results suggest that the cause of the observed TID is not caused by ionospheric plasma instability but by gravity waves in the thermosphere. According to these results, we conclude that the observed TIDs in all three cases are caused by gravity waves in the thermosphere.
CHAMP, ionosphere, gravity waves, 630-nm airglow imager
CHAMP, ionosphere, gravity waves, 630-nm airglow imager
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 21 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts