Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Effect of Pillars of Infrastructure on Wellbeing in Handsworth

Authors: Whitter, Ruben;

The Effect of Pillars of Infrastructure on Wellbeing in Handsworth

Abstract

This research explores the impact of key infrastructure pillars—housing; education; environmental factors; local economy; waste management—on the wellbeing of residents in Handsworth, Birmingham (United Kingdom) - achieved by looking at Handsworth individually and through comparison to Stirchley, another district in the city. Handsworth is a historically diverse - densely populated - urban area with a rich cultural heritage but faces challenges in terms of infrastructure strain - particularly in housing and environmental resources. Stirchley on the other hand, has seen recent regeneration efforts with a slightly lower population density and different demographic trends - creating a contrasting urban landscape. Stirchley's infrastructure development, including its environmental sustainability measures, provides a meaningful comparison to highlight how different approaches to urban planning can affect wellbeing. The comparison between these two areas is significant as it allows for the examination of how infrastructure quality and availability; within the context of suggestable variences; impact community health, socio-economic conditions, and overall quality of life. These findings aim to highlight the critical role that local infrastructure plays in shaping wellbeing in neighbourhoods and provides insights for future urban planning and policy development.

The study utilised a mixed-methods approach. Using historical map analysis to track changes in greenspace over time; assessing whether greenspace was lost to development (buildings and streets) or added alongside new infrastructure as a means of mitigating potential negative side effects of such. Visual observations or areas were investigated and noted in person during daytime general work to lunch hours to count and evaluate various factors influencing infrastructure and wellbeing like environmental factors; ranging from the built environment - such as roads and buildings - as well as natural elements such as parks and greenspaces. More subjective observations - such as behavioural patterns - were correlated with objective observations derived from comparative analysis. This research was informed by the insights of Centric Lab, conducted with supervision an academic specialising in Urban Planning with lifelong ties to Handsworth - Deborah Broomfield - and investigated by a poet and artist with a tangible interest in architecture and the built environment - Ruben Whitter - who relocated to the area less than five years prior to the completion date of the report; so this collaborative effort integrates academic rigour with lived experiences which provides a nuanced arts-based 'wellbeing-focused' perspective that enriches the findings.

Keywords

Social wellbeing, FOS: History and archaeology, poverty, Housing and Education, Community, Complex analysis, Environmental impact, Waste Management, Sustainable development, Urban studies, Social geography, Recycling, Environmental sustainability, Public housing, report, Other social sciences, Literary genres, FOS: Social sciences, Comparative analysis, Social and Economic Conditions, economy, Political economy, Public infrastructure, Sustainability sciences, Regional human rights, Art-Based Research and Cultural Heritage, Environmental Factors, Transport planning, Earth and related environmental sciences, Environmental engineering, Social sciences, Social policy, Cultural anthropology, Cultural policy, Waste management, Educational sciences, Green areas, Social aspects of transport, Socioeconomic conditions, Architectural design, Urban engineering, Economics and business, city, Social anthropology, Socioeconomics, Cultural and economic geography, Housing, britain, FOS: Other social sciences, british, Built environment, Public libraries, Urban development, Social psychology, Urban policy, Comparative Studies, wellbeing, Regional comparison, Art and society, cities, Public health, Cultural heritage, Social issues, Sustainable economy, Public transport, Educational facilities, poetry, Quality of life, Public services, Sustainable building, Public policies, Natural resources management, FOS: Economics and business, Socioeconomic, History and archaeology, Infrastructure and Urban Planning, Sustainable architecture, FOS: Educational sciences, Family planning, Sustainable transport, Architecture engineering, City planning, birmingham, Public administration, Communities, FOS: Environmental engineering, economics, FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences, Environmental sciences, comparison, Community development, Population density, Health economics, Innovation management, Smart cities, Social inequalities

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green