
This whitepaper addresses the increasing recognition of preprints in academic research, particularly within the biosciences, and offers comprehensive recommendations for institutional policies and practices to enhance their adoption. Preprints—manuscripts shared publicly before peer review—have gained traction as effective tools for knowledge dissemination, exemplified by their pivotal role during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the clear benefits of preprints, such as expedited visibility and citation potential, institutional recognition remains insufficient, particularly in contexts like hiring and promotion, which rely heavily on traditional peer-reviewed publications.
metascience, preprints, institutional policy
metascience, preprints, institutional policy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
