
Abstract The article examines the stance of Russian scientific circles on the concept of «ruscism», a term widely used by Ukrainian and Western scholars to describe an authoritarian and ultranationalist ideology emerging in Russia. While early critiques of Vladimir Putin's policies were common in Russia, the annexation of Crimea in 2014 marked a shift, with much of the intellectual elite increasingly aligning with nationalist views. Russian researchers largely avoid or dismiss the term «ruscism». Only a few scholars, often working outside Russia, recognize ruscism as a form of fascism and chauvinism, seeing it as a hybrid ideology blending ultranationalism, imperialism, militarism, and totalitarianism. These elements are used to legitimize Russia's aggressive foreign policy and imperial ambitions. The article highlights the denial and fear within Russia’s scientific community regarding this phenomenon, contrasting it with the recognition seen among researchers outside the country. Keywords: ruscism, Russia, Putin, nazism, putinism, Russo-Ukrainian War
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
