Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Keynes's A Treatise on Probability is based on Boole's formal, mathematical, symbolic logic: Keynes was a formalist and logicist

Authors: Michael Emmett Brady;

Keynes's A Treatise on Probability is based on Boole's formal, mathematical, symbolic logic: Keynes was a formalist and logicist

Abstract

Abstract J M Keynes’s work in his A Treatise on Probability (1921) is based on the formal application of Boole’s relational, propositional logic and interval valued probability as presented in his The Laws of Thought (1854). Keynes then based his A Treatise on Money and General Theory on his work in Part II of the A Treatise on Probability as presented in Chapters X through XVII. This work is the basis for Keynes’s comments on mathematical and statistical methods and application in chapters 6,7 and 8 of Volume I of his 1930 A Treatise on Money and chapters 4 ,12 and 17 of the General Theory on using approximation, inexact measurement and reasonable calculation as opposed to precise ,exact, unreasonable mathematical expectations. Keynes’s clear statements in his Treatise on Probability about the nature of his technical work can only lead to the following conclusion -Keynes was a formalist and a logicist .All existing orthodox and heterodox “interpretations” of Keynes’s works are attempts by economists to reinterpret Keynes’s work ,so as to try to fit him into some version of either Benthamite utilitarianism (precise probability and precise utility a la James Tobin,1958) or a nihilist position(Joan Robinson ,G L S Shackle ,T. Lawson ,Post Keynesians ,Institutionalists). Keynes’s position is so clearly defined and presented by him in his A Treatise on Probability that the only conclusion possible is that both orthodox and heterodox economists have never read Keynes’s A Treatise on Probability ,except possibly for small , scattered bits and pieces cobbled together in a confused and confusing manner .The justification for this decision not to read the A treatise on Probability is based on the false claim that F P Ramsey had shown that Keynes’s formal, Boolean, relational , propositional logic was erroneous .Accepting Ramsey’s false claims thus made it impossible for economists to see that the underlying foundations of the A Treatise on Money and General Theory are built on the formal ,mathematical analysis presented in Part II of Keynes’s A treatise on Probability. Keynes later extended his propositional logic to include an introductory use of predicate (1st order) logic as defined on p.56 and applied in chapter 33 of the A Treatise on Probability on pp.405-425. Keywords: Boolean relational, propositional logic; mathematical, formal, symbolic logic; objective, logical, probability relation; related versus unrelated propositions.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average