
Bringing the public voice into frontline research is an NIHR priority. Researchers regularly acknowledge that PPIE input improves both work and outcomes. Public participants are keen to influence the direction of research. In the AI space, with its issues of contested data, trust and transparency, establishing a meaningful dialogue between different constituencies takes on special importance. So why is PPIE often bland, ineffective or just goes badly wrong? This talk was presented as part of the AIM RSF Open Invitation Seminar.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
