
Recommended citation:Soares, F. M., Saraiva, A. M., Pires, L. F., Drucker, D. P., Braghetto, K. R., Santos, L. O. B. D. S., Moreira, D. D. A., Corrêa, F. E., & Delbem, A. C. B. (2025). A novel ux-based approach for ontology evaluation: Applying tree testing to the agricultural product types ontology. IEEE Access, 13, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3595447In evaluating the APTO ontology, we selected tree testing as the primary UX measuring protocol. We believe tree testing is particularly suitable for ontology evaluation as it combines various metrics, such as time on task and task success, to assess how users navigate and understand a hierarchy of concepts. This method allows us to trace user paths through the ontology's structure, identifying which aspects of the modeling may be confusing or inaccurate from the user's perspective. By analyzing these user interactions, we can gain valuable insights into how the ontology's design impacts usability, ultimately guiding improvements to better align with user needs.Update in this version: images of pietrees.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
