
This article presents a comparative linguistic analysis of polygraphic units in English and Uzbek languages. It explores the structural and semantic characteristics of polygraphic elements, examining their similarities and differences in both languages. The study highlights how these polygraphic units, including abbreviations, acronyms, and initialisms, function within their respective linguistic systems. The research provides insights into the historical and cultural factors influencing the development and use of these units. By comparing English and Uzbek polygraphic units, this work contributes to the understanding of how polygraphy evolves across different language systems and enriches modern lexicology.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
