
The Geometric Factor (k) can become infinite with a high spatial gradient for certain geometries used in Induced Polarisation (IP) surveys. This can lead to significant errors in computed apparent resistivities. Understanding the behaviour of the Geometric Factor for the different arrays used in mineral exploration is key to avoiding misleading interpretation of geoelectrical data. It is well known that at long offsets, high Geometric Factor values amplify low voltages to generate noisy apparent resistivities. However, at short offsets, equipotentials can represent an important source of noise. Practical solutions, such as varying the spacing between current electrodes or adjusting their positions along specific axes and changing the line spacing can be implemented to mitigate these geometry related issues. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of careful geometric design in IP surveys and provides guidelines for optimising electrode configurations to obtain reliable results.
Induced Polarisation, Geometric Factor, Apparent Resistivity., Survey Design
Induced Polarisation, Geometric Factor, Apparent Resistivity., Survey Design
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
