<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This video is a supplementary video material to the paper "Sparse camera volumetric video applications. A comparison of visual fidelity, user experience , and adaptability". It shows a comparision of five volumetric videos scenes, captured with three different sparse volumetric video applications. This video aims to visualize the difference in fidelity and artifacts that each system expresses.
videography, Kinect, volumetric, Software applications, depth sensors, review, RGBD, video, comparision
videography, Kinect, volumetric, Software applications, depth sensors, review, RGBD, video, comparision
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |