Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

NORD STREAM 2: IMPACTO E VIABILIDADE

Authors: Arrabal, Gabriel Yudji Kataoka; Baptista, José Abel de Andrade; Novais, Rosana Aparecida Bueno de;

NORD STREAM 2: IMPACTO E VIABILIDADE

Abstract

The presence of Russia in the European gas market is a topic of interest and concern in the geopolitical scene and tends to increase with Nord Stream 2. In this article, Nord Stream 2 and the arguments for and against are analyzed from a geopolitical and economic perspective, focusing on the impact the project may have on the energy markets of the European Union, Poland and Ukraine, and its economic viability is questioned due to sanctions and fines recently imposed by Poland and the United States. The coherence of the project's supporters and detractors is also questioned, with political and economic motivations analyzed to determine their true position. A review of the existing literature is carried out, with scientific, opinion and journalistic articles considered, to allow the formation of an objective point of view and the analysis of contemporary developments. Due to the geopolitical focus of the existing literature, this paper identifies the need for a deeper economic analysis of Nord Stream 2, because its economic viability is denied or exalted without much substance, with sanctions and fines not yet contemplated in studies after an intensification in 2019 and 2020, which transformed them into measures that can directly impact the project and even compromise the probable profit that the companies involved would enjoy.

A presença da Rússia no mercado Europeu de gás é um tópico de interesse e preocupação na cena geopolítica e tende a aumentar com a Nord Stream 2. Neste artigo, a Nord Stream 2 e os argumentos a favor e contra são analisados sob uma ótica geopolítica e econômica, com foco no impacto que o projeto pode ter nos mercados energéticos da União Europeia, Polônia e Ucrânia, e sua viabilidade econômica é questionada devido a sanções e multas recentemente aplicadas por Polônia e Estados Unidos. A coerência dos apoiadores e detratores do projeto também é questionada, com motivações políticas e econômicas analisadas para determinar sua verdadeira posição. Uma revisão da literatura existente é realizada, com artigos científicos, de opinião e jornalísticos considerados, para permitir a formação de um ponto de vista objetivo e a análise de desenvolvimentos contemporâneos. Devido ao foco geopolítico da literatura existente, este trabalho identifica a necessidade de uma análise econômica mais profunda da Nord Stream 2, pois sua viabilidade econômica é negada ou enaltecida sem muita substância, com sanções e multas ainda não contempladas em estudos após uma intensificação em 2019 e 2020, que as transformou em medidas que podem impactar diretamente o projeto e até comprometer o provável lucro do qual as empresas envolvidas desfrutariam.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Rússia, Nord Stream 2, Polônia, Nord Stream, Gás natural, Poland, Natural gas, Russia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green