Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Comparative Study of Oral Clonidine (150mcg) Vs Oral Gabapentin (300mg) as Premedication on Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Incidence of Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting and Post-Operative Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Middle Ear Surgeries

Authors: Kanagaraj M; Soundarya A; V. Dineshkumar;

A Comparative Study of Oral Clonidine (150mcg) Vs Oral Gabapentin (300mg) as Premedication on Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Incidence of Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting and Post-Operative Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Middle Ear Surgeries

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative hemodynamic changes, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and post-operative pain are common challenges in middle ear surgeries. This study compared the effects of oral clonidine and gabapentin as premedication on these parameters. Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of a single dose of oral clonidine (150mcg) and oral gabapentin (300mg) on intraoperative hemodynamics, PONV incidence, post-operative pain relief, and adverse effects in patients undergoing middle ear surgeries. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on 180 ASA I and II patients divided into three groups (n=60 each): clonidine, gabapentin, and placebo. The study drugs were administered one hour before surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamics, PONV incidence, post-operative pain scores (VAS), and adverse effects were recorded. Results: Clonidine and gabapentin significantly reduced heart rate and blood pressure compared to the placebo group (p<0.05). PONV incidence was significantly lower in the clonidine and gabapentin groups (p<0.05), with clonidine showing better results. Post-operative VAS scores were significantly lower in the clonidine and gabapentin groups (p<0.05), with clonidine providing better pain relief. No significant adverse effects were noted. Conclusions: Premedication with oral clonidine (150mcg) or gabapentin (300mg) effectively attenuates intraoperative hemodynamic changes, reduces PONV incidence, and provides better post-operative pain relief compared to placebo in patients undergoing middle ear surgeries. Clonidine showed superior results compared to gabapentin.

Background: Intraoperative hemodynamic changes, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and post-operative pain are common challenges in middle ear surgeries. This study compared the effects of oral clonidine and gabapentin as premedication on these parameters. Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of a single dose of oral clonidine (150mcg) and oral gabapentin (300mg) on intraoperative hemodynamics, PONV incidence, post-operative pain relief, and adverse effects in patients undergoing middle ear surgeries. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on 180 ASA I and II patients divided into three groups (n=60 each): clonidine, gabapentin, and placebo. The study drugs were administered one hour before surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamics, PONV incidence, post-operative pain scores (VAS), and adverse effects were recorded. Results: Clonidine and gabapentin significantly reduced heart rate and blood pressure compared to the placebo group (p<0.05). PONV incidence was significantly lower in the clonidine and gabapentin groups (p<0.05), with clonidine showing better results. Post-operative VAS scores were significantly lower in the clonidine and gabapentin groups (p<0.05), with clonidine providing better pain relief. No significant adverse effects were noted. Conclusions: Premedication with oral clonidine (150mcg) or gabapentin (300mg) effectively attenuates intraoperative hemodynamic changes, reduces PONV incidence, and provides better post-operative pain relief compared to placebo in patients undergoing middle ear surgeries. Clonidine showed superior results compared to gabapentin.

Keywords

Clonidine, Gabapentin, Premedication, Middle ear surgery, Hemodynamics, PONV, Post-operative pain

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average