Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2024
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Software . 2024
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Software . 2024
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Validation of an indoor real-time location system for tracking sheep

Authors: Woods, Jocelyn; Adcock, Sarah;

Validation of an indoor real-time location system for tracking sheep

Abstract

Precision livestock technologies such as remote sensors are increasingly used to monitor the health, behavior, and welfare of livestock. We aimed to evaluate the performance of a commercially available ultra-wideband real-time location system (UWB RTLS) for tracking the 2D spatial locations and distances traveled by meat-breed ewes and lambs in an indoor barn. First, we assessed static performance by attaching the sensors to stationary posts and arranging them in a 1 x 1 m grid throughout the barn (29.0 x 11.8 m) for a total of 285 locations. At each post location, the sensors were placed at approximate ewe (0.9 m) and lamb (0.3 m) wither height. The precise 2D locations of each post were recorded using a laser tape measurer and used as the ground truth for comparison to the RTLS' recorded x and y coordinates. Secondly, we conducted a dynamic validation test to evaluate the positional error and percent error of distances traveled while the sensors were worn by six free-roaming ewes and their singleton lambs. The ground truth locations of each sheep were recorded from video frames every second over 15 minutes and compared to the RTLS data. Overall static and dynamic error was 0.39 ± 0.20 m (mean ± SD) and 0.53 ± 0.31 m, respectively. Static error was lower in sensors positioned at lamb height than at ewe height, but the opposite pattern was true for dynamic error. Error was higher in pens further from the master anchor. Ground truth and RTLS distances traveled were positively correlated but the RTLS overestimated distances by 54% on average. In conclusion, the UWB RTLS can acquire precise location estimates that are suitable for a range of scientific and practical applications, but distance estimates should be adjusted to account for overestimation.

Funding provided by: United States Department of AgricultureROR ID: https://ror.org/01na82s61Award Number: 1025418

Please see the description in the associated research publication.

Related Organizations
Keywords

positioning accuracy, ultra-wideband, sensors, Animal behavior, precision livestock farming

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average