Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

To Assess the Ease of LMA Insertion with Ketofol versus Propofol in Paediatric Patients

Authors: Krishna Kant Karunakar; Mumtaz Hussain; K. H. Raghwendra;

To Assess the Ease of LMA Insertion with Ketofol versus Propofol in Paediatric Patients

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol) and propofol on the insertion conditions of laryngeal mask airway in pediatrics. Methods: The Prospective Double Blind comparative study was done in the department of anesthesiology & critical care medicine IGIMS, Patna, Bihar after taking approval from institute ethical committee with CTRI Registration done: CTRI/2020/10/028242. Written informed consent was taken from each participants of the study. The Data was collected between – October 2020 to December 2021. There were total 100 patients in the study and divided into two groups with 50 each. Results: Patients under 2-14 years of age comprised the majority of study population. The P value is 0.524 and there was no statistically significant difference in the age of the patients between the two study groups. Patients under male and female comprised the majority of study population. 80% male and 20% female in Group FP and 88% male and 12% female in Group KP. Patients under ASA Grade I and II. The present study showed 94% patients in Grade I and 6% in Grade II of Group FP and 92% patients in Grade I and 8% in Grade II of Group KP. Patients of LMA size I and II. 84% patients in I and 16% in II of Group FP and 94% patients in I and 6% in II of Group KP. Swallowing/Gagging 90% patients Score 1, 6% patients score 2 and 4% score 3 of Group FP. 94 % patients Score 1, 4% patients score 2 and 2% score 3 of Group KP. The P. value is significant. (P = 0.001). Conclusion: In this study, I conclude that co-induction with Ketamine (1 mg/kg) and Propofol (2.5 mg/kg) for insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway in children provided better insertion conditions and minimal alteration in haemodynamic parameters than co-induction with Fentanyl (1μg/kg) and Propofol (2.5 mg/kg).

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol) and propofol on the insertion conditions of laryngeal mask airway in pediatrics. Methods: The Prospective Double Blind comparative study was done in the department of anesthesiology & critical care medicine IGIMS, Patna, Bihar after taking approval from institute ethical committee with CTRI Registration done: CTRI/2020/10/028242. Written informed consent was taken from each participants of the study. The Data was collected between – October 2020 to December 2021. There were total 100 patients in the study and divided into two groups with 50 each. Results: Patients under 2-14 years of age comprised the majority of study population. The P value is 0.524 and there was no statistically significant difference in the age of the patients between the two study groups. Patients under male and female comprised the majority of study population. 80% male and 20% female in Group FP and 88% male and 12% female in Group KP. Patients under ASA Grade I and II. The present study showed 94% patients in Grade I and 6% in Grade II of Group FP and 92% patients in Grade I and 8% in Grade II of Group KP. Patients of LMA size I and II. 84% patients in I and 16% in II of Group FP and 94% patients in I and 6% in II of Group KP. Swallowing/Gagging 90% patients Score 1, 6% patients score 2 and 4% score 3 of Group FP. 94 % patients Score 1, 4% patients score 2 and 2% score 3 of Group KP. The P. value is significant. (P = 0.001). Conclusion: In this study, I conclude that co-induction with Ketamine (1 mg/kg) and Propofol (2.5 mg/kg) for insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway in children provided better insertion conditions and minimal alteration in haemodynamic parameters than co-induction with Fentanyl (1μg/kg) and Propofol (2.5 mg/kg).

Keywords

Ketofol, Laryngeal mask airway insertion, Propofol

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average