Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Collaborative Roles of Pharmacists and Respiratory Therapists in Optimizing Non-Invasive Ventilation and Medication Management in Acute Respiratory Failure Patients

Authors: Wayil H. Alanazi; Amal T. Alenazi; Mansour Alotaibi; Hala H. Almutairi;

Collaborative Roles of Pharmacists and Respiratory Therapists in Optimizing Non-Invasive Ventilation and Medication Management in Acute Respiratory Failure Patients

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a critical intervention for managing acute respiratory failure (ARF), often preventing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of collaboration between pharmacists and respiratory therapists on optimizing NIV and pharmacotherapy to improve patient outcomes. Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted at [Hospital Name], including 150 patients with ARF. The intervention group (n = 75) received collaborative care involving pharmacists optimizing medication regimens (e.g., bronchodilators, sedatives) and respiratory therapists managing NIV settings. The control group (n = 75) received standard care. Outcomes included the progression to invasive ventilation, respiratory function, medication-related adverse events, and patient comfort. Results: The intervention group had a significantly lower progression to invasive mechanical ventilation (18% vs. 30%, p = 0.045), shorter duration of NIV use (72.3 vs. 85.7 hours, p = 0.021), and improved respiratory function (PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, p = 0.021). Medication-related adverse events were lower in the intervention group (8% vs. 18%, p = 0.038). Patients in the intervention group reported higher comfort and compliance with NIV (RASS score -1.2 vs. -2.4, p < 0.001). ICU and hospital lengths of stay were also reduced (ICU: 6.4 vs. 8.1 days, p = 0.017; hospital: 10.5 vs. 13.2 days, p = 0.024). Conclusion: Collaboration between pharmacists and respiratory therapists significantly improves patient outcomes in ARF by reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, improving respiratory function, and enhancing patient comfort. This interdisciplinary approach should be considered in critical care settings.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average