Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project milestone . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project milestone . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

M5.8 - Pilot for Exposing Repository Trustworthiness Status and FAIR Data and Code Assessment Outcomes in Generic and Disciplinary Registries and Portals

Authors: Huber, Robert; Ulrich, Robert; L'Hours, Hervé; Hugo, Wim; Neidiger, Charlotte; Parkes, Oliver; Chue Hong, Neil; +2 Authors

M5.8 - Pilot for Exposing Repository Trustworthiness Status and FAIR Data and Code Assessment Outcomes in Generic and Disciplinary Registries and Portals

Abstract

The purpose of this Milestone is to provide a progress report on the prototype development, embodying FAIR-IMPACT’s approach to implementing the principles outlined in the initial version of the “Guidelines for repositories and registries on exposing repository trustworthiness status and FAIR data assessments outcomes” (Milestone 5.2). The proposed standards and technology stack are based on insights gathered through the activities in the earlier project FAIRsFAIR “Fostering FAIR Data Practices In Europe” and cross-work package collaboration and exchange among the FAIR-IMPACT project partners. This application of this stack is aimed at complementing the guidelines' technology and tool-agnostic character by establishing an initial linking and information structure for the prototype to be developed. It is intended to bridge repositories with registries and discovery services, thereby facilitating the better exposure and discovery of repository information. The registry role within the prototype will be covered both by re3data - registry of research data repositories, as well as DANS. In addition, the prototype will enable the provision of information on the object level as well as quality measures due to the extensibility of the chosen technology stack. This work will serve as the foundation for the development of future guideline versions. Suggestions collected from the community will be used for revising, extending, and refining the transparent exposure of repository information and its support in registries, like re3data, as well as other services, such as F-UJI and CoreTrustSeal. Thus the approach is similar to the development of the guidelines and ensures that not only the prototype but also the guidelines themselves remain responsive to the needs and insights of stakeholders.

Keywords

FAIRiCAT, FAIR assessment, DCAT, prototype, registry, Transparency, FAIR, Trustworthiness

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
LifeWatch ERIC