Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Image . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

Melanoma Histopathology Dataset with Tissue and Nuclei Annotations

Authors: Schuiveling, Mark;

Melanoma Histopathology Dataset with Tissue and Nuclei Annotations

Abstract

Description: This dataset is designed for development of deep learning models for segmentation of nuclei and tissue in melanoma H&E stained histopathology. Existing nuclei segmentation models that are trained on non-melanoma specific datasets have low performance due to the ability of melanocytes to mimic other cell types, whereas existing melanoma specific models utilize older, sub-optimal techniques. Moreover, these models do not provide tissue annotations necessary for determining the localization of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, which may hold value for predictive and prognostic tasks. To address this, we created a melanoma specific dataset with nuclei and tissue annotations. Methodology: Sample Collection: Regions of interest (ROIs) were sampled from H&E stained slides of 103 primary melanoma specimens and 102 metastatic melanoma specimens, scanned using a Hamamatsu scanner at 40× magnification (0.23 μm per pixel). All slides were obtained from regular diagnostic procedures.From each specimen, a 40× magnified ROI of 1024×1024 pixels was selected for annotation. Additionally, a context ROI of 5120×5120 pixels was sampled to provide information about the broader context for the annotation process. Selection was performed by a trained medical expert (M.S.) and subsequently verified by a dermatopathologist (W.B.). Manual ROI selection ensured the inclusion of diverse tissue and nuclei types. Annotation Process: Nuclei segmentationNuclei segmentations were generated using Hover-Net pretrained on the PanNuke dataset. Manual annotation adjustments were performed by author M.S. using QuPath, with the following nuclei categories: tumor, stroma, vascular endothelium, histiocyte, melanophage, lymphocyte, plasma cell, neutrophil, apoptotic cell, and epithelium. All annotations were reviewed and corrected, where needed, by a dermatopathologist (W.B.). Tissue segmentationTissue segmentations were created manually using QuPath by M.S., with the following categories: tumor, stroma, epidermis, necrosis, blood vessel, and background. Annotations were reviewed and corrected, where needed, by a dermatopathologist (W.B.). Quality Control: To assess the reliability of the annotations, intra- and interobserver agreement (by pathologist G.B.) were determined on 12 randomly selected ROIs. Nuclei segmentationThe intraobserver overall precision was 84.89%, with a recall of 86.45%, and an F1 score of 85.66%. Interobserver overall precision was 80.34%, with a recall of 80.62%, and an F1 score of 80.20%. These results are based on the sum of all true positive, false positive, and false negative counts for the 12 ROIs. Tissue segmentationThe DICE score was determined on the same 12 randomly selected ROIs. The average intraobserver DICE score was 0.90, and the interobserver DICE score was also 0.90. Version 3:Removed sample "training_set_metastatic_roi_103" due to inconsistencies in annotation file. Version 4:Sample training_set_metastatic_roi_088 missed one color annotation for a nuclei_apoptosis in the geojson file rendering it qupath uncompatible. This is fixed in the new version. 

Related Organizations
Keywords

Nuclei Segmentation, Histopathology, Deep learning, TILs, Melanoma, Supervised learning

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research