Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Table 4 in Assessing grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) occupancy and detection probability within Lake Erie from environmental DNA

Authors: Bopp, Justin; Nathan, Lucas R.; Robinson, John D.; Kanefsky, Jeanette; Scribner, Kim T.; Herbst, Seth; Robinson, Kelly F.;

Table 4 in Assessing grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) occupancy and detection probability within Lake Erie from environmental DNA

Abstract

Table 4. Percentage of positive eDNA replicate detections in each month and site in 2018 and 2019 in western Lake Erie (based on at least one positive detection on at least one marker and one replicate). All markers (GCTM10, GCTM 22, GCTM32) were used to calculate these proportions. Samples were collected monthly from June to November for each site. The number of telemetered grass carp detected within 7 days before sampling for eDNA is denoted in parentheses. Acoustic telemetry receivers in MB in 2018 were not available. DR = Detroit River, HP = Hot Ponds, and MB = Maumee Bay. NA denotes when acoustic telemetry receivers were not in operation. YearSite20182019JuneJulyAugSeptOctNovMayJuneJulyAugustOctNovDR0.0%2.3%2.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%4.5%10.614.117.4%14.1%2.2%(1)(1)(2)(1)(2)(0)(1)% (1)% (1)(2)(2)(0)HP0.0%0.1%4.1%2.2%15.8%0.0%9.0%1.5%34.81.5%15.8%22.7%(1)(1)(2)(2)(3)(NA)(2)(2)% (2)(3)(2)(2)MB12.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%6.1%37.18.3%8.3%0.0%(NA)(NA)(NA)(NA)(NA)(NA)(0)(0)% (0)(0)(0)(0)

Published as part of Bopp, Justin, Nathan, Lucas R., Robinson, John D., Kanefsky, Jeanette, Scribner, Kim T., Herbst, Seth & Robinson, Kelly F., 2024, Assessing grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) occupancy and detection probability within Lake Erie from environmental DNA, pp. 64 in Management of Biological Invasions 15 (1) on page 64, DOI: 10.3391/mbi.2024.15.1.04, http://zenodo.org/record/11976725

Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average