Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Inferring strain-level mutational drivers of phage-bacteria interaction phenotypes arising during coevolutionary dynamics

Authors: Lucia-Sanz, Adriana; Peng, Shengyun; Leung, Chung Yin (Joey); Gupta, Animesh; Meyer, Justin; Weitz, Joshua;

Inferring strain-level mutational drivers of phage-bacteria interaction phenotypes arising during coevolutionary dynamics

Abstract

The enormous diversity of bacteriophages and their bacterial hosts presents a significant challenge to predict which phages infect a focal set of bacteria. Infection is largely determined by complementary – and largely uncharacterized – genetics of adsorption, injection, cell take-over and lysis. Here we present a machine learning approach to predict phage-bacteria interactions trained on genome sequences of and phenotypic interactions amongst 51 Escherichia coli strains and 45 phage l strains that coevolved in laboratory conditions for 37 days. Leveraging multiple inference strategies and without a priori knowledge of driver mutations, this framework predicts both who infects whom and the quantitative levels of infections across a suite of 2,295 potential interactions. We found that the most effective approach inferred interaction phenotypes from independent contributions from phage and bacteria mutations, accurately predicting 86% of interactions while reducing the relative error in the estimated strength of the infection phenotype by 40%. Feature selection revealed key phage l and E. coli mutations that have a significant influence on the outcome of phage-bacteria interactions, corroborating sites previously known to affect phage l infections, as well as identifying mutations in genes of unknown function not previously shown to influence bacterial resistance. The method's success in recapitulating strain-level infection outcomes arising during coevolutionary dynamics may also help inform generalized approaches for imputing genetic drivers of interaction phenotypes in complex communities of phage and bacteria.

Funding provided by: United States Army Research OfficeROR ID: https://ror.org/05epdh915Award Number: W911NF1910384 Funding provided by: National Science FoundationROR ID: https://ror.org/021nxhr62Award Number: 2200269 Funding provided by: NIH Common FundROR ID: https://ror.org/001d55x84Award Number: R01 AI146592 Funding provided by: Simons FoundationROR ID: https://ror.org/01cmst727Award Number: 930283 Funding provided by: Howard Hughes Medical InstituteROR ID: https://ror.org/006w34k90Award Number: 311169

Keywords

Phenotypes, Bacteria, Machine learning, Mutant genotypes, Bacteriophages, Coevolution

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average